[eiken] pre-1 interview examples II

에이켄 준1급 면접 준비

Should people stop using paper in order to protect the environment?

#1

Completely stopping paper use may not be necessary, but reducing paper consumption and promoting sustainable practices can help protect the environment. Transitioning to digital alternatives and using recycled paper products can significantly minimize the environmental impact of paper production. Balancing the convenience of paper with eco-friendly choices is a more practical approach to environmental conservation.

 

#2

People should not necessarily stop using paper altogether to protect the environment. Instead, they can adopt more sustainable practices, such as recycling, using eco-friendly paper products, and reducing paper consumption, to minimize environmental impact while still utilizing paper when necessary.

 

Is new technology having a negative effect on people's lives?

#1

New technology's impact on people's lives varies widely and is not universally negative. While some argue that technology can lead to issues like digital addiction or privacy concerns, it also brings numerous benefits, such as increased connectivity, access to information, and improved efficiency in various aspects of life. The overall effect of technology depends on how it is used and the extent to which individuals manage their digital interactions.

 

#2

New technology can have both positive and negative effects on people's lives. Its impact depends on factors like individual usage patterns, access to information, and how well it's integrated into daily routines. Technology itself is not inherently negative; it's the way it's utilized that determines its effects on people's lives.

 

Should the government be allowed to access people's private data?

#1

Yes, the government should be allowed to access people's private data, but within the bounds of strict legal regulations and safeguards to protect individual rights and privacy. Access to private data can be essential for national security, law enforcement, and public safety purposes, but it should be conducted with transparency, accountability, and oversight to prevent misuse and violations of civil liberties. Striking a balance between security and privacy is crucial in this context.

 

#2

No, the government should not have unrestricted access to people's private data. Maintaining privacy is a fundamental right, and widespread government access can infringe upon civil liberties and individual freedoms. Instead, any data access should be subject to stringent legal scrutiny, focusing on protecting citizens' rights and limiting intrusions to cases of proven necessity, such as in national security or criminal investigations.